Author: Ben Argeband

Gem vs SeekOut comes down to your bottleneck: Gem for engagement workflow and follow-up, SeekOut for sourcing discovery and segmentation. Includes a diagnostic table, weighted checklist, and outreach templates.

A Head of Talent comparison of Gem vs HireEZ using a sourcing depth vs workflow framework. Includes a diagnostic table, weighted checklist, outreach templates, governance notes, and a 3-week rollout plan.

A Head of Talent seekout review focused on real outreach outcomes: SeekOut can improve candidate discovery, but placement speed depends on closing the reachability gap with current, ethical contact paths.

A practical comparison of SeekOut for candidate discovery vs Swordfish as a reachability layer to improve placement speed, candidate experience, and opt-out compliance—plus diagnostic and copy/paste outreach templates.

SeekOut vs HireEZ comparison for TA leaders: choose by workflow/team size, pilot sourcing depth and reporting, and measure reachability separately to improve replies and placement speed.

HireEZ review from a Head of Talent lens: strong discovery and list building, but many teams still hit a reachability gap. Includes a KPI-driven workflow, ethics guidance, and copy/paste outreach templates.

HireEZ finds candidates. Swordfish connects them. This guide explains the find vs connect split, how to run an outcomes-based evaluation, and includes diagnostic and outreach assets to improve reply rates for passive candidates and hard-to-reach roles

Compare Fetcher alternatives using a build vs buy sourcing framework. Includes a diagnostic table for low replies, a weighted decision checklist, and copy/paste outreach templates focused on placement speed and candidate experience.

A Head of Talent guide to LinkedIn Recruiter alternatives using a discovery vs outreach framework, with a diagnostic table, weighted checklist, and copy/paste outreach templates focused on placement speed and candidate experience.